Guarding Blue Tsunami💥🌪🌊🌈

cat lover BeAVoter I believe survivors #TheResistance #MeToo #FlipTheSenate #FlipTheHouse #ImpeachKavanaugh

Joined on October 18, 2018

Statistics

We looked inside some of the tweets by @BlueBlu71147833 and here's what we found interesting.

Inside 100 Tweets

Time between tweets:
5 days
Average replies
44
Average retweets
561
Average likes
1131
Tweets with photos
24 / 100
Tweets with videos
5 / 100
Tweets with links
5 / 100

Recommended

Check out our new cool site: http://www.tumgir.com

Last Seen Profiles

@77878pso2@77878pso2
@jadynpowers11@jadynpowers11
@viiiil12@viiiil12
@domomonet_@domomonet_
@oshi_atsuko@oshi_atsuko
@yuehuaspam@yuehuaspam
@Most_High662@Most_High662
@fukuthiu_@fukuthiu_
@Chiremba15@Chiremba15
@pmpm8666@pmpm8666
@V5T926BTgH6BPi8@V5T926BTgH6BPi8
@naoki_SAO3@naoki_SAO3
@Calistotitan@Calistotitan
@insaciable18R@insaciable18R
@Clipvdox@Clipvdox
@TheNepp@TheNepp

If you’re going to have universal access to quality health care ,you need a strong investment in science —Nancy Pelosi #HealthCareForAll #ProtectDreamers #IAmWithNancy #SpeakerPelosi @TeamPelosi @NancyPelosi

6
11
25
加州原产植物公猫三叶草(tomcat clover),这个是真的三叶草(豆科三叶草属)。加州大约有50种三叶草。
2

加州原产植物公猫三叶草(tomcat clover),这个是真的三叶草(豆科三叶草属)。加州大约有50种三叶草。

《为什么男人也有乳头》是我在2009年12月写的,当时发在《中国青年报》的专栏,后来收入《大象为什么不长毛》一书,被很多人剽窃,这倒也罢了,现在腾讯居然反过来说我是剽窃别人的,取消了该文的原创标志,真是贼喊捉贼。我还有很多文章被人剽窃包括被百度百科剽窃,以后都要反过来成了我剽窃别人了。
2

《为什么男人也有乳头》是我在2009年12月写的,当时发在《中国青年报》的专栏,后来收入《大象为什么不长毛》一书,被很多人剽窃,这倒也罢了,现在腾讯居然反过来说我是剽窃别人的,取消了该文的原创标志,真是贼喊捉贼。我还有很多文章被人剽窃包括被百度百科剽窃,以后都要反过来成了我剽窃别人了。

Barr Letter doesn't change the fact that Trump campaign vendor servers were seized under criminal warrant in London. The UK authorities didn't get full cooperation on the passwords to all seized servers until long after Cambridge Analytica folded. But no obstruction of justice?

Barr Letter doesn't change the fact that Trump campaign vendor servers were seized under criminal warrant in London. The UK authorities didn't get full cooperation on the passwords to all seized servers until long after Cambridge Analytica folded. But no obstruction of justice?

9
66
110

The ICO ordered Cambridge Analytica to answer basic questions about our data starting in 2017 until January 2019 when they finally pled guilty while in administration to the criminal offense of ignoring the ICO. These guys mastered the art of not cooperating with the authorities.

1
16
33
COLBERT: Do you trust Barr's judgment on obstruction here?

WARREN: No.
Via CBS

COLBERT: Do you trust Barr's judgment on obstruction here? WARREN: No. Via CBS

122
638
3K

Quoted @nicholas_bagley

The Justice Department has now announced that it will not defend any part of the Affordable Care Act. If it has its way, the entire ACA should fall. https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/letter-from-DOJ.pdf …

The GOP plan for ACA: Sabotage it, then leave it to die in the gutter, along with the people who rely on it for coverage. The Barr DOJ is having quite a week.

38
554
735

And if you think the rule of law is some quaint relic of a bygone age, well, you may miss it when it's gone.

48
325
1K

Maybe this level of disdain for an Act of Congress is to be expected from the Trump administration. Maybe it doesn't bother you because Russia and Iran and ... . But stay woke, people. This is not business as usual. This is not OK. This is a threat to the rule of law.

13
523
2K

It's also a close cousin to a decision not to enforce the law at all -- after all, if the law is unconstitutional, as the administration apparently believes, how can it be enforced at all? To do so would violate the very Constitution that empowers the President to act.

11
303
935

And here's where it gets even scarier: the Trump administration's apparent belief that it has no obligation to defend an Act of Congress not only flies in the face of centuries of Justice Department practice.

15
437
1K

Every single reputable commentator -- on both the left and the right -- thinks this opinion is a joke. *No one* has defended Judge O'Connor's opinion. No one could. This is not a "reasonable minds can differ" sort of case. It is insanity in print.

10
376
1K

The depth of bad faith on display here is jaw-dropping. And the sheer reckless irresponsibility is worse. The notion that you could gut the entire ACA and not wreak havoc on the lives of millions of people is insane. It is now part of the plumbing of the health-care system.

34
755
2K

This is from an administration that claims to support protections for people with preexisting conditions. This is from an administration that claims to care about the plight of the uninsured. This is from an administration that has a duty to defend the law.

15
587
2K

The Justice Department has now announced that it will not defend any part of the Affordable Care Act. If it has its way, the entire ACA should fall. https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/letter-from-DOJ.pdf …

262
3K
2K

Quoted @nicholas_bagley

The Justice Department has now announced that it will not defend any part of the Affordable Care Act. If it has its way, the entire ACA should fall. https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/letter-from-DOJ.pdf …

This is a critical thread. Barr DOJ is gutting the time honored traditions of the Dept. Instead of pursuing their duty to defend the law, they are subverting it. Beyond the pale. Not only is anyone with preexisting conditions left w nothing, so too are those who believe in law.

310
4K
6K
Ke Chen
2 hours ago

Quoted @PressSec

Mueller Madness! Which of the angry and hysterical @realDonaldTrump haters got it most embarrassingly wrong? #YouDecide

Mueller Madness! Which of the angry and hysterical @realDonaldTrump haters got it most embarrassingly wrong? #YouDecide

社会精英都错了,川大帝是清白的。这是回到了中世纪吧。

We've come a long way!

We've come a long way!

15
507
2K

On this day in 1911, 146 workers - mostly young women - died in the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire. Many of our workplace protections today exist because of what happened more than a century ago. We all do better when we value each other. Read more at:

0
5
4
《西雅图时报》的这个头条言简意赅,准确无比:《巴尔:没勾结,没释罪》。《洛杉矶时报》社论:《不,穆勒报告并非对川普“完全释罪”》。
2

《西雅图时报》的这个头条言简意赅,准确无比:《巴尔:没勾结,没释罪》。《洛杉矶时报》社论:《不,穆勒报告并非对川普“完全释罪”》。

发表新文章《再说说美国“中医大师”有四个博士学位》https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/TEfPisIB3rSg3KGsuZDfLQ …

0
3
13
Next Page