I think we all know by now that, just like Kavanaugh, the investigation was purposefully limited in scope and was never going to bring the result the media kept telling viewers it would. @nytimes is definitely a part of that but I think they’re more proud of it than anything.
They had nothing to do with Russian collusion or obstruction so he sent them to the SDNY. He found them though .. We all know there was no collusion- so did Mueller so he did his job. Why are you guys so upset? I just hope we learn how this was even able to happen
He found them inadvertently&handed them off bc they weren’t in his scope. Collusion isn’t a crime so of course Mueller wasn’t going to find it. He was tasked w/ investigating conspiracy. It has such a high bar there was no way he was going to find that either.
DoJ policy is to not bring a case unless you can win. Mueller certainly found evidence of other crimes but they were outside his scope &/or unprosecutable. Trump is not saint, the NYT has known that for decades & has chosen to disregard their unspoken oath as the fourth estate.
Can you investigate why Schiff lied in his Memo about Ohr's timeline with the FBI? Schiff said Ohr first met with FBI in late Nov - after initial FISA. He accused Nunes of misleading for saying it was before. Ohr testified it was early August. Memo page 7 - Testimony page 47
That would be your opinion & you're entitled to it as well as the right to express that opinion & so am I. The moment society STOPS considering the basis for the opposition's stance, that's when radicalism sprouts. I'm a frustrated & extremely disappointed former Republican ...
& a frustrated, disappointed non practicing Catholic. Both of these groups chose to become extreme & forcing their belief systems onto others, while publicly ostracizing those that didn't fit THEIR mold. Grievously Oppressive Pricks & 100's of cases of clergy abuse. Hypocrites